Which statement best describes the Minor Servicing Exemption?

Which statement best describes the Minor Servicing Exemption?

• A. Conducted during normal business hours
• B. Not requiring lockout
• C. Routine, repetitive and integral to the use of the machine
• D. Requires removal of electrical energy

Answer: (C)

The key idea is that some tasks are considered minor and routine enough to not require full lockout/tagout. The Minor Servicing Exemption covers work that is routine, repetitive, and integral to the machine’s operation, and that can be done during normal production without creating or introducing energy hazards. This means tasks like simple lubrication, routine adjustments, or cleaning that are part of keeping the machine running, and which can be performed quickly and safely, may be done without applying the full lockout process. That’s why the best description is “Routine, repetitive and integral to the use of the machine.” It identifies the nature of the work that qualifies for the exemption. Conducting work during normal business hours, not requiring lockout, or removing electrical energy are not the defining criteria for the exemption, and if the task involves more than routine maintenance or could introduce hazards, lockout would still be required.

The key idea is that some tasks are considered minor and routine enough to not require full lockout/tagout. The Minor Servicing Exemption covers work that is routine, repetitive, and integral to the machine’s operation, and that can be done during normal production without creating or introducing energy hazards. This means tasks like simple lubrication, routine adjustments, or cleaning that are part of keeping the machine running, and which can be performed quickly and safely, may be done without applying the full lockout process.

That’s why the best description is “Routine, repetitive and integral to the use of the machine.” It identifies the nature of the work that qualifies for the exemption. Conducting work during normal business hours, not requiring lockout, or removing electrical energy are not the defining criteria for the exemption, and if the task involves more than routine maintenance or could introduce hazards, lockout would still be required.